Prediction of Bethanie Mattek-Sands [665th] vs Ena Shibahara [135th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W L L L L L W L
Form
W W L L W L W L W LH2H: Mattek-Sands 1 - 0 Shibahara
They have played 3 sets in total, with Mattek-Sands winning 2 and Shibahara winning 1. The last match between Mattek-Sands and Shibahara was at the Tennis in the Land - Cleveland, 23-08-2021, First, Hard with Bethanie Mattek-Sands getting the victory 6-4 3-6 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Bethanie Mattek-Sands | 1 |
| Ena Shibahara | 0 |
| Mattek-Sands | Stats | Shibahara |
|---|---|---|
| 50% (1-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 47% (8-9) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 665 | Ranking | 135 |
| 30 | Highest Rank | 132 |
| 40 | Age | 27 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 5 | Titles | 1 |
| 53% (357-314) | Career Total W/L | 59% (145-102) |
| $1,691,151 | Career Prize Money | $205,348 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
Mattek-Sands VS Shibahara H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 3-6 6-1 |
Stats 
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
Player
Ena Shibahara
59%
(
51 of
86)
1st Serve %
48%
(
38 of
79)
2
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
5
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
79)
87
Total Points Won
78
|
||||
Mattek-Sands VS Shibahara H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 11 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 7 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 2:1:0 | Average Match Time | 2:1:0 |
| 59% (51/86) | 1st Serve % | 48% (38/79) |
| 69% (35/51) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (27/38) |
| 57% (20/35) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (20/41) |
| 50% (4/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (2/6) |
| 41% (32/79) | Return Points Win % | 36% (31/86) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Bethanie Mattek-Sands vs Ena Shibahara Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Mattek-Sands 1 - 0 Shibahara
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mattek-Sands has won 32.69% of points on their second serve, while Shibahara has won 47.74%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mattek-Sands, in recent form, has won 46.51% of their opponent's second serve points, while Shibahara has won 46.48%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.98% and 31.34% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mattek-Sands has saved 26.67% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Shibahara has saved 51.2% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mattek-Sands has won 50% of matches played (W/L 1/ 1), with Shibahara winning 62.3% (W/L 38/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mattek-Sands has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 108/ 83), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 51% (W/L 180/ 173). Shibahara has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 14/ 7), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 11/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Mattek-Sands has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 50% of matches (W/L 1/ 1), where as Shibahara has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.71% of matches (W/L 17/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mattek-Sands winning 1 times and Shibahara being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Mattek-Sands winning 2 and Shibahara winning 1. The last match between Mattek-Sands and Shibahara was at the Tennis in the Land - Cleveland, 23-08-2021, First, Hard with Bethanie Mattek-Sands getting the victory 6-4 3-6 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:1:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Mattek-Sands and Shibahara have played a deciding set 1 times, with Mattek-Sands winning 1 times and Shibahara 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Mattek-Sands winning 0, and Shibahara 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mattek-Sands has played against opponents with an average rank of 226.5 while Shibahara has played against players with an average rank of 244.95.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mattek-Sands has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Shibahara has won 58% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mattek-Sands has converted 45.45% of breakpoint opportunities, and Shibahara has converted 39.53% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Bethanie Mattek-Sands Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Shuai Zhang
Player
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
73%
(
64 of
88)
1st Serve %
62%
(
52 of
84)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
28 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
84)
94
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
Player
Sophie Chang
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
10
53%
(
16 of
30)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
47%
(
23 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Viktoria Hruncakova
Player
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
39%
(
26 of
67)
1st Serve %
48%
(
20 of
42)
8
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
2
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
46%
(
31 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ksenia Zaytseva
Player
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
74%
(
63 of
85)
1st Serve %
55%
(
54 of
98)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
52%
(
33 of
63)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
48%
(
41 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
46 of
98)
90
Total Points Won
93
|
2-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
Player
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
70%
(
43 of
61)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Linda Fruhvirtova
Player
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
60%
(
15 of
25)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
46%
(
19 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
53
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Danka Kovinic
Player
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
Player
Xiaodi You
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
84)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
31 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
84)
88
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lauren Davis
Player
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Magdalena Frech
Player
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Ena Shibahara Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Victoria Mboko
Player
Ena Shibahara
63%
(
68 of
108)
1st Serve %
103%
(
61 of
59)
14
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
1
79%
(
54 of
68)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
54 of
88)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
36 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
56 of
138)
128
Total Points Won
118
|
6-4 6-7(8) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Miriam Bianca Bulgaru
95%
(
76 of
80)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
86%
(
19 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
10 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jaqueline Cristian
Player
Ena Shibahara
62%
(
63 of
101)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
29 of
37)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
41%
(
41 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
22 of
68)
82
Total Points Won
87
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Hanna Chang
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
55%
(
22 of
40)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Ena Shibahara
64%
(
56 of
87)
1st Serve %
66%
(
62 of
94)
4
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
7
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
43%
(
37 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
47 of
94)
97
Total Points Won
84
|
4-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Zeynep Sonmez
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve %
51%
(
34 of
67)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
22 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hailey Baptiste
Player
Ena Shibahara
56%
(
40 of
72)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
6-0 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ajla Tomljanovic
Player
Ena Shibahara
59%
(
64 of
109)
1st Serve %
59%
(
63 of
107)
2
Aces
12
11
Double Faults
8
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
43 of
63)
53%
(
24 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
39 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
39 of
107)
109
Total Points Won
107
|
7-5 3-6 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Kimberly Birrell
58%
(
50 of
86)
1st Serve %
53%
(
50 of
94)
10
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
61%
(
22 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
94)
98
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Kaja Juvan
66%
(
54 of
82)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
80)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
8
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
28 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
80)
87
Total Points Won
75
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Mattek-Sands vs Shibahara?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Mattek-Sands Vs Shibahara is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53% (357/314) | Win/Loss | 59% (145/102) |
| 53% (834/742) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (324/248) |
| 51% (7505/7150) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (2793/2465) |
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.23 |
| 966 | Aces Total | 587 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 1220 | Total Double Faults | 604 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:23:51 |
| 70.89 | Average Opponent Rank | 230.39 |
| 59% (19018/32398) | 1st Serve % | 63% (8640/13818) |
| 63% (12063/19018) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (5559/8620) |
| 47% (6329/13387) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (2527/5254) |
| 44% (1726/3882) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (723/1592) |
| 44% (14208/32186) | Return Points Win % | 44% (6104/13936) |
| 53% (352/661) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (142/242) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (75/153) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 59% (32/54) |
| 49% (116/239) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (46/83) |
| 83% (368/304) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (145/125) |
| 17% (368/61) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (145/19) |
| 17% (303/51) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (102/19) |
See recent tennis photos of Mattek-Sands and Shibahara
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
